Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 620 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon 620 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 620 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1024MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 620 Mobile
0.786 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +280%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
May 2015
Mobility Radeon
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
1024 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
28
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

8.192 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
24.58 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
786.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
786.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
49.15 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 24
GPU Name
Amethyst
Polaris 24 XL
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
5 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy