Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and a Desktop platform GPU: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (2200MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M
3.379 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +125%
7.603 TFLOPS
Blender
Radeon 680M
244
CMP 40HX +430%
1294
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2021
Navi II IGP
Generation
Mining GPUs
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
8GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
256bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
12
RT Cores
36
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
185W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy