Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro W7170M

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro W7170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M +671%
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Oct 2015
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Amethyst
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
5 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy