Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (12W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM +249%
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jan 2011
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.148 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.592 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
110.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.176 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GF119
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
N12M-GS
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy