Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q +416%
1.983 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jan 2018
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 10 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1152 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.97 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.98 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.983 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
61.97 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GP107
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
N17P-G1-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy