Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230 +104%
0.784 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Feb 2019
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1519 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
256
32
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GP108
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy