Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E6460 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD Radeon E6460 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E6460 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E6460
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M +259%
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Nov 2015
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
6
160
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Opal
E6460
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy