Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E6465 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

AMD Radeon E6465 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E6465 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E6465
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB +2300%
4.608 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Jul 2022
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
757 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
160
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.608 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy