Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E6465 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

AMD Radeon E6465 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E6465 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1755MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E6465
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +4580%
8.986 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1455 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
2
Compute Units
-
160
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.24 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.986 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.986 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
140.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy