Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E8950 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

AMD Radeon E8950 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1350MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E8950
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +170%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Jun 2017
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
256.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Vega 10
E8950
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy