Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD FirePro W6150M

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M +32%
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Nov 2015
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
12
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Emerald
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy