Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R5 A320

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R5 A320

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1219MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM +136%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 A320
0.528 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Jan 2015
Embedded
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
750 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
5
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.50 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
528.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Jet
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy