Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs AMD FirePro M6000

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 MXM +109%
2.15 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jul 2012
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
10
896
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Heathrow
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
43W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy