Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1594MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 MXM +75%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Feb 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
896
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
GP108
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy