Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2007
Embedded
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
M66
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
M66-P (216BGCKC13FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy