Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD FirePro W4170M

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD FirePro W4170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1200MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 PCIe +211%
2.15 TFLOPS
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Apr 2015
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
6
896
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Opal
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy