CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 PCIe
+167%
2.15 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mac Edition
0.804 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Aug 2009
Embedded
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
10
896
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.12 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
804.8 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
161.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Baffin
GPU Name
M98
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
GPU Variant
M98 L2 (216-0732019)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R5 A240
2
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
3
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
4
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M
5
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
6
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R7 A360
7
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
8
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
9
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
10
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy