Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro M4100

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro M4100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +1035%
5.834 TFLOPS
FirePro M4100
0.514 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Oct 2013
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
6
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.360 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.08 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
514.6 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.16 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Mars
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Mars M2 PRO/LP (216-0842009)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy