Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro S4000X

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro S4000X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM FirePro S4000X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1266MHz vs 775MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S4000X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +488%
5.834 TFLOPS
FirePro S4000X
0.992 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
775 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
640
144
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.40 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.00 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
992.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Venus
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Venus XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy