AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1266MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+153%
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2.304 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
1024
144
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU117
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
