AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1455MHz vs 1266MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
+14%
6.705 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Mar 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
2304
Shading Units
2304
144
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.12 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
209.5 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.41 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.705 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
209.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU106B
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
