AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA NVS 3100M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 512MB VRAM NVS 3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+12312%
5.834 TFLOPS
NVS 3100M
0.047 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2010
Embedded
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
16
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT218
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
N10M-NS
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
