Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1266MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +709%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Oct 2014
Embedded
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Topaz
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy