Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650M XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 120W)
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2416MHz vs 1266MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650M XT +69%
9.896 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
Embedded
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
2068 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
2416 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2048
144
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
154.6 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
309.2 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.79 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.896 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
618.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 23
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy