AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1266MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+5%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
Embedded
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
2304
Shading Units
2560
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GA107
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
