Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe vs AMD FirePro W6170M

AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9560 PCIe and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1237MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9560 PCIe +189%
5.7 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1237 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
14
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.58 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
178.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
5.700 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.700 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
356.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy