AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1400MHz vs 950MHz)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 320SP
0.896 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 580
+22%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Sep 2015
Renoir
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
576
20
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.550 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.40 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
273.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
Skylake GT4e
-
-
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 9.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm+
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
