CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs NVIDIA GeForce G102M
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs NVIDIA GeForce G102M
VS
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
NVIDIA GeForce G102M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce G102M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce G102M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 15W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 384SP
+3191%
1.152 TFLOPS
GeForce G102M
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 384SP
VS
GeForce G102M
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Renoir
Generation
GeForce 100M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.800 GPixel/s
36.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
2.304 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1152 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
C79
-
GPU Variant
MCP79MX
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
15W
TDP
14W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile
2
Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
3
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
4
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
5
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
6
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP
7
AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs NVIDIA GeForce G102M
8
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
9
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 8310G IGP
10
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 8280E
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy