Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +116%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
3
Compute Units
6
240
Shading Units
480
12
TMUs
24
12
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.212 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
7.212 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
288.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Turks
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy