Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 +189%
1.111 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1111 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GM107
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GM107-300-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy