Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA NVS 310

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO +284%
0.384 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GF119
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy