Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD FirePro W7100

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100 +592%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tonga
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy