Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +2460%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 33
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 33
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy