Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2950 PRO vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

ATI Radeon HD 2950 PRO vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2950 PRO and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2950 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2004
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
NV41
RV670 PRO ES (215-0708001)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy