CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2950 XTX and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2950 XTX
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+911%
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2950 XTX
VS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2019
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1126 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
72.06GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
1408
16
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
TU116
RV670 XTX (215-0708004)
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Board Design
110W
TDP
125W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
3
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
5
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
8
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1
9
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM
10
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX vs AMD Radeon VII
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy