Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 4200 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
8 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4200 IGP
0.04 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition +127%
0.091 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
TeraScale IGP
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
40
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RS880
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
-
-
-
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy