Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 4200 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4200 IGP
0.04 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU +4125%
1.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2009
Release Date
Sep 2020
TeraScale IGP
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.379 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.690 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
422.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RS880
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
-
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
-
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy