Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 29W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 PCI +225%
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Apr 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
40
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
-
-
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
29W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GF119
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy