Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +5835%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
40
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
TU106
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy