Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +5872%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
28
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy