Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +2500%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Lexa
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy