Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 AGP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 10.40GB/s)
136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4350 AGP
0.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +458%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
10.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
80
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV710
GPU Name
GT200B
RV710 (215-0725016)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy