Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4670 vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI Radeon HD 4670 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4670 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4670 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 59W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4670
0.48 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +30%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon R700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
6
320
Shading Units
480
32
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Turks
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

59W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy