Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs AMD FirePro W8000

ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 63.68GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4850 X2
1 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +222%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
995 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.68GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
28
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R700
GPU Name
Tahiti
R700 PRO (215-0669065)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy