CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
VS
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon R9 280X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X
+241%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
VS
Radeon R9 280X
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon R700
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
32
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV770 XT Mac (215-0669080)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 560X
2
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
3
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GS
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
5
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
7
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs ATI FireMV 2250
8
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
9
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Pro A50
10
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 4650
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy