Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4890 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

ATI Radeon HD 4890 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4890 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4890 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4890 +185%
1.36 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
975 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
124.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

13.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
34.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1360 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
272.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV790
GPU Name
GT200
RV790 XT (215-0758016)
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.959 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
282 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy