Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs AMD FirePro S9000

AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000 +3001%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
Northern Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
28
80
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cedar PRO
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy