Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +1838%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2010
Northern Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
18
80
Shading Units
1440
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
Cypress
Cedar PRO
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy