Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6330M vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon HD 6330M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6330M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6330M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (7W vs 20W)
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6330M
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900 +200%
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Oct 2010
Vancouver
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
2
80
Shading Units
160
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Robson
GPU Name
Seymour
Robson LP
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

7W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy