CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
VS
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
ATI Radeon HD 5850
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5850 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
+30%
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5850
2.088 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
VS
Radeon HD 5850
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Sep 2009
Northern Islands
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1050 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
18
1600
Shading Units
1440
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.088 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cypress
Cypress XT (215-0735033)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO (215-0735043)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
151W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
2
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 810
3
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM
4
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP
5
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
6
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs Intel Arc A380
7
NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
8
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 5550
9
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 3830
10
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition vs AMD FirePro W9100
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy